theJumps
Ruth

An exciting genealogical day

posted on Sunday, February 26, 2006 by Ruth in [Genealogy]
 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...

Today Kevin has found:

  • A great (*n) aunt who saw fit to name her children Oliver, Cromwell and Wellington.
  • A branch of the family who hail from Dodge City, North Wales, which was apparently neither in England nor Wales, and therefore fell under nobody’s legal responsibility.

It rather makes my Orange Lodge connections in one direction, and illegitimacy in another, pale into insignificance…

Kevin

More genealogy

posted on Thursday, February 2, 2006 by Kevin in [Genealogy]
 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...

The family tree continues to grow. We now have 198 names in our family tree. And we can go back eight generations from Daisy in at least two directions.

a treeThe internet rocks for this, at first I can be hard to find the information but once you’ve got the right places you can (and do) spend all night looking through names, and working it all out. So much so, that when we’ve been looking for software to put the tree into (currently we’re using genesreunited) one feature a few of them have is an alarm to tell you to go to bed.

Today. I took the next step, and actually went to the library, and looked at parish records on microfilm, valuable lesson of the day? When you know you’ve written down the information you need to find, make sure you then take that piece of paper with you to the library.

All wasn’t lost, I at least have gotten over the first hurdle and spoken to people and used the machines, so the fear factor isn’t stopping me anymore. Next time I will take all the right information.

Ruth

Genealogical Addiction

posted on Thursday, January 26, 2006 by Ruth in [Genealogy]
 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...

Kevin and I have been researching the whole family tree thing, recently. It’s something we get enthused about, and delve obsessively into, every couple of years, before we get bored and watch telly instead.

On this occasion, we’ve excelled ourselves in the obsessing - we’ve expanded the Genesreunited family tree from about thirty names, to a hundred and thirty, by exploring in pretty much every direction. Two things have struck us so far:

1) When we’re looking at maps to try and find where our ancestors actually lived, we’re facing the same problems - the entire area around Scottie Road has been levelled, re-planned, and rebuilt in the last fifty years, and none of the street still exist. But we’re looking in pretty much the same area. What are the odds? I’ve ended up married to someone whom I met in a graduate environment, full of people who don’t even hail from Liverpool, and our backgrounds are incredibly similar. But for one key difference, I keep expecting to find out we’re blood related, somehow…

The key difference, of course, is which SIDE of Scotland Road we’re looking at - his family hail from the side closest to the river, whereas mine are from the inland side. I’m not 100% certain, but I’m prepared to hazard a guess that the inland side is the Protestant side, and the river-most side is the Catholic one… Generations ago, we were probably chucking rocks at each other.

2) We’ve also been watching “Who Do You Think You Are?” on the Beeb, and it seems to us that all the major celebrities whose ancestry they’ve studied have hit Poor Law Relief of some sort - Jeremy Paxman had someone claiming from the Alms houses, then being shipped to Bradford to find work in the mills, and someone else emigrating to Canada with the Sally Army to avoid the Glasgow workhouse; Stephen Fry had ancestors who were in and out of the workhouse, in between trips to Margate to be treated for TB. Kevin and I have yet to find a single workhouse connection. All of our ancestors, so far, have been hard-working, Respectable Working Class. No professionals, aside from our immediate generation (and my mother), but always with a decent trade, or failing that, a labouring job. It turns out that to be rich and famous in this world, you need to descend from Oliver Twist. Go figure.

Kevin

The Spread of the Jumps,

posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2006 by Kevin in [Genealogy]
 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 Votes | Average: 0 out of 5 (rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...

The beeb, have an interesting little story about a website run by UCL (University Collage London) , that shows the migration of surnames. When the site isn’t falling over with load you type in the surname, and you get pictures showing you the spread of the surname, in 1881, and again in 1998. So of course when you’re like me and your distancing yourself from your given name, you type in your current surname. Below are the 1881 locations for the Jumps and the 1998 locations, darker colours mean there where/are more of them.


JUMP in 1881

JUMP in 1998

What struck me, is the incredibly small area the name covers, this should in theory make family history easier.